Post developed by Katie Brown.
2013 came in at the fourth hottest on record. Yet, the Alberta Clipper plummeted the nation’s temperatures this week, a return of the polar vortex that descended earlier this month. These extreme weather patterns have renewed debate over climate change.
Recently, the Center for Political Studies (CPS) featured an expert on national agreements around climate change as part of their Harold Jacobson lecture series. Established in 2002 to honor Jacobson, the Jacobson Lecture is an annual talk by leaders in the fields of international organization, international law, foreign policy, and the environment.
This year, CPS welcomed David G. Victor, a professor at the School of International Relations and Director of the Law and Regulation Laboratory at the University of California, San Diego. In his talk entitled, “The Global Climate Crisis: Will International Cooperation be Effective?,” Victor outlined a rather dire situation around international law concerning the climate. Despite the current state of affairs, Victor posited that we are at a turning point.
To leverage this turning point effectively, Victor pointed to four key things that can make for more effective international negotiations:
- Create flexible “clubs” instead of global treaties. That is, stop thinking about the climate as a global problem. Instead, set up small groups that take direct responsibility for parts of the problem.
- Celebrate the lower emissions enabled by technological innovation. These advances are fortuitous and promise to keep helping the situation.
- Focus on solidifying and clarifying trade rules.
- Seek small steps in the right direction. Or, as Victor describes it, seek “singles and walks, not homers.”
Victor’s conclusion hits notes of optimism. The last twenty years have not worked, he laments. But the system is headed in the right direction. Following the four steps outlined above will help steer us toward more effective, cooperative climate regulation.